Back

Patenia-Kinatac-An etc. vs. Patenia-Decena etc.

ROWENA PATENIA-KINATAC-AN, ZOSIMA ROWELA PATENIA-DANGO, FE RUCHIT PATENIA ALVAREZ, FATIMA ROBERTA PATENIA-TRUPA, REY ANTHONY G. PATENIA AND RICARTE ABSALON G. PATENIA, PETITIONERS, VS. ENRIQUETA PATENIA-DECENA, EVA PATENIA-MAGHUYOP, MA. YVETTE PATENIA-LAPINED ABO-ABO, GIL A. PATENIA, ELSA PATENIA IOANNOU AND EDITHA PATENIA BARANOWSKI, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 238325 | 2020-06-15

FIRST DIVISION
 

DECISION
 
LOPEZ, J.:
 
The validity of a donation of an immovable property is the core issue in this Petition for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Court of Appeals' (CA) Decision[1] dated June 30, 2017, in CA-G.R. CV No. 04126, which affirmed the findings of the Regional Trial Court (RTC).
 
ANTECEDENTS

Spouses Ramiro and Amada Patenia (Spouses Patenia) owned a 9,600-square meter (sq m) lot situated in Magugpo, Tagum City, Davao del Norte and registered under Transfer Certificate of Title (TCT) No. T-168688.[2] After Spouses Patenia's death,...