Back

Rodil vs. Posadas

DR. VIRGILIO S. RODIL, COMPLAINANT, VS. IMELDA V. POSADAS, RECORDS OFFICER II, REPORTERS DIVISION, COURT OF APPEALS, RESPONDENT.

A.M. No. CA-20-36-P | 2021-08-03

EN BANC
 
D E C I S I O N
 
PER CURIAM:
 
This administrative matter stemmed from the findings in a Per Curiam Decision[1] of the Court in Administrative Case No. (AC) 10461 entitled Dr. Virgilio S. Rodil v. Atty. Andrew Carro, Samuel Ancheta, Jr. and Imelda Posadas. In the said case, the Court imposed the penalty of disbarment upon Atty. Andrew Carro (Atty. Carro) and ordered the Office of the Administrative Services (OAS) of the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals (CA) to conduct the corresponding investigations on Samuel Ancheta, Jr. (Ancheta)[2] and the subject of the instant case, Imelda V. Posadas...