Back

Ebal and Her Minor Child vs. Thenamaris Philippines, Inc.

ETHYL HUISO EBAL & HER MINOR CHILD, ON BEHALF OF THE DECEASED EDVILLE CLIANO BELTRAN, PETITIONERS, VS. THENAMARIS PHILIPPINES, INC., NARCISSUS ENTERPRISES S.A., GREGORIO F. ORTEGA, PRESIDENT & ALL CORPORATE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS, AND THE SHIP, M/T SEACROSS, RESPONDENTS. [G.R. No. 257584] THENAMARIS PHILIPPINES, INC., NARCISSUS ENTERPRISES S.A., CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER ABUY, AND CAPTAIN WILLIAM MAGALLANES, PETITIONERS, VS. JU-ANN BELTRAN AND JHUN VILLE BELTRAN, AS WIFE/CHILD & HEIRS OF EDVILLE BELTRAN, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 241844 (formerly UDK 16236) | 2023-11-29

D E C I S I O N
 
SINGH, J.:
 
Before the Court are the consolidated Petitions for Review on Certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court in G.R. No. 241844,[1] formerly UDK 16236, and G.R. No. 257584.[2]
 
In G.R. No. 241844, petitioners Ethyl Huiso Ebal (Ethyl) and her minor child, Travez Jake Ebal Beltran (Travez), on behalf of the deceased Edville Cliano Beltran (Edville), seek to set aside the Decision,[3] dated February 14, 2018, and the Resolution,[4] dated June 22, 2018, of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. SP No. 150753. The CA dismissed their Rule 65 Petition, questioning the Decision,[5]...