Back

Sps. Balucan vs. Sps. Nageli

SPS. BUENAVENTURA BALUCAN, JR. AND YOLANDA Y. BALUCAN, RUTH M. CABUSAS, GEMMA BARCELONA AND MYANN BALUCAN, PETITIONERS, VS. SPS. LENNIE B. NAGELI AND RUDOLF NAGELI, REPRESENTED BY THEIR ATTORNEYS-IN-FACT, SPS. EPPIE B. FADRIGO AND TEODORICO FADRIGO, RESPONDENTS.

G.R. No. 262889 | 2023-11-13

D E C I S I O N
 
LOPEZ, J., J.:
 
This Court resolves a Petition for Review on Certiorari[1] under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court assailing the Decision[2] and Resolution[3] of the Court of Appeals (CA), which dismissed the Petition for Certiorari[4] filed by petitioners Spouses Buenaventura Balucan, Jr., and Yolanda Y. Balucan, Ruth M. Cabusas, Gemma Barcelona, and Myann Balucan (Sps. Balucan et al.) for being the wrong remedy to question the Order[5] issued by the Secretary of the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR) which denied Sps. Balucan et al.'s appeal and affirmed their disqualification...