Back

Teehankee vs. Rovira [CONCURRING AND DISSENTING, OZAETA, PARAS, PERFECTO, J.]

HAYDEE E HERRAS TEEHANKEE, petitioner, vs. LEOPOLDO ROVIRA, ANTONIO QUIRINO, and POMPEYO DIAZ, respondents.

G.R. No. L-101 | 1945-12-20

CONCURRING AND DISSENTING
 
OZAETA, PARAS, and PERFECTO, JJ.,
 
We concur in the opinion prepared by Mr. Justice Hilado in so far as it holds that subsections (16) and (17), section 1, Article III of the Constitution[a] are applicable to the instant case; and that the Rules of Court, particularly sections 3 to 8 of Rule 110, govern the procedure in the People's Court as to applications for bail under the first proviso of section 19 of Commonwealth Act No. 682.
 
But we are constrained to dissent from said opinion and its dispositive part in so far as the Court fails to enforce and give practical effect to the...