Back

Ledesma vs.Pictain

PURA KALAW LEDESMA y RAFAEL LEDESMA, demandantes y apelados, contra EMILIO PICTAIN, demandado y apelante.

G.R. No. L-597 | 1947-08-29

D E C I S I O N

PERFECTO, M.:

Conforme con el resultado.

FERIA, J., dissenting and concurring:

Under Commonwealth Act No. 689, as amended by Republic Act No. 66, as construed by this Court in the case of Santos vs. De Alvarez (78 Phil., 503), the only cases in which a tenant may be ousted are (1) deliberate failure to pay the rents, (2) sublease of the premises without the consent of the lessor, and (3) necessity of the landlord to occupy the premises.

A lessee may be ousted, even before the expiration of the term of lease stipulated by the parties or provided by law, if the lessee (1) deliberately fails to pay the rents, or (2)...